Showing posts with label red. Show all posts
Showing posts with label red. Show all posts

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Here they go again...

Anonymous writes:
I don't think there is enough material to really constitute these as dresses, especially since they don't have backs either. 

They are just very very very short.

They also look as if they are in the middle of a girls on cars montage in a bad 80's hair band music video. In fact as I write this post, I'm listening to Quiet Riot for inspiration. True story. And I want to bang my head against the wall after seeing this picture. 







Thursday, March 25, 2010

Who Wore it Worst?

This shirt, apparently, can be worn as both shirt AND dress. Or can it?

Get the look!

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Lady in Red is wearing no pants


The next line in Lady in Red is "Cheek to Cheek." Yes, I think we can see her "cheek to cheek."

BTW, that "dress" is from H&M and I tried it on a couple weeks ago. It is NOT a dress. It is see-through, tight, and should be paired with skinny jeans or leggings. I think I can see her belly button.